From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] OMAPDSS: DISPC changes for writeback pipeline Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:46:32 +0300 Message-ID: <1347612392.2559.54.camel@deskari> References: <1347538505-25359-1-git-send-email-archit@ti.com> <1347611263.2559.44.camel@deskari> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xP1g4GOkMwWWMzz6kEiC" Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog130.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.143]:46410 "EHLO na3sys009aog130.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752024Ab2INIqg (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 04:46:36 -0400 Received: by lagy9 with SMTP id y9so2556679lag.19 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:46:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1347611263.2559.44.camel@deskari> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Archit Taneja Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org --=-xP1g4GOkMwWWMzz6kEiC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 11:27 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:44 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: > > This series prepares the low level DISPC driver(dispc.c) to configure w= riteback > > registers. The aim is to reuse most of the code as most of its register= s are > > like overlay or manager registers, and are configured in the same way i= n most > > cases. The first few patches rename dispc_ovl_* functions to dispc_plan= e_* >=20 > I'm not sure if the renaming causes more confusion than clarity... It > kinda creates a mishmash of ovl/plane names, and the term "plane" > doesn't really sound like it's a base for both overlays and wb. Could we > consider the wb as a special case, and keep the ovl name for most of the > things and have "wb" used for wb specific things? And while WB is a combination of overlays and ovl managers, do you think it'd be difficult to consider WB as a special, extended overlay? So just call it an overlay, and consider it as an overlay with special features, at least inside dispc.c. We probably need to have it as a totally different entity from user's point of view (i.e. the list of overlays wouldn't return WB, etc). Tomi --=-xP1g4GOkMwWWMzz6kEiC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQUu7oAAoJEPo9qoy8lh71cLcP/3z8g7Q3ri4JJnJCEf4yUorI 5kBgSLkOkt1il1E6g9wLiCURI5iphHO9rWDPMifXA6ozfNcZ4TNLRybOiRJWTtaX 4dxHBbH/SQJsqnVmAKFTNDWftq0Nwi1+k1Zj5bMkCfFka8bUNUUPmIRpwYG3Kp8V 8gAWNb8XeJw0Fx8c2WcUU0i80167zHF/0kzYYTPe8US/c+zQsjemqNJ3XnhA5YC2 KDXWCehHeSoUXSPe6oskrK6Pm7Pb5u6GqVyYkqfn6sLvgVzkOJeWfx6/WJIuf4qg wFqhy+e3IkF/SE2hvl6nTes4igivY2hQdlcH2vAJ7uef5qvo4f3UG3ISqQwPu3lD Qnqj6eOPuJ4dSxFfIZpkTyIKhFOKG/tbUVPjvfoUYWE3vRxUZaOzPWrnGpb2FHDf 2WZGcGMvDbL9Fgq6ddlWASKh+NJFMFRM/6+5IN3qK0iLOjJJfwk+rmvO7hfqJy/t kaZeVO9xk2I4c3SJahJIC757wv3jcjL39bp0cRUnuHNjQyMONirp4oHNztPoPD13 g9hU+dB9Aj5qexL0SVCIJlJ3R/Tkriw76LTxhsYQsaj7cXAGf811PPDB1SFVOO/+ /a5u3FA5r8GgrZR7ebVtfV/GYShYeseraRGFgUzc7FmGgbwzRthxdrcDVSt5MkKl iZBFpYwYkFMcUqTBonBA =pX0o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xP1g4GOkMwWWMzz6kEiC--