From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Subject: Re: Converting vrfb.c
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:18:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349345938.32558.0.camel@lappyti> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121003184149.GG4840@atomide.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2172 bytes --]
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 11:41 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [120928 08:02]:
> > * Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> [120928 05:05]:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm a bit at loss how to deal with drivers/video/omap2/vrfb.c.
> > >
> > > VRFB is part of the SDRAM controller on OMAP2 and OMAP3. vrfb.c uses the
> > > following functions from sdrc.h:
> > >
> > > omap2_sms_write_rot_control();
> > > omap2_sms_write_rot_size();
> > > omap2_sms_write_rot_physical_ba();
> > >
> > > There are no other dependencies to the sdrc.c.
> > >
> > > Those functions are quite simple:
> > >
> > > void omap2_sms_write_rot_control(u32 val, unsigned ctx)
> > > {
> > > sms_write_reg(val, SMS_ROT_CONTROL(ctx));
> > > }
> > >
> > > void omap2_sms_write_rot_size(u32 val, unsigned ctx)
> > > {
> > > sms_write_reg(val, SMS_ROT_SIZE(ctx));
> > > }
> > >
> > > void omap2_sms_write_rot_physical_ba(u32 val, unsigned ctx)
> > > {
> > > sms_write_reg(val, SMS_ROT_PHYSICAL_BA(ctx));
> > > }
> > >
> > > vrfb.c is in turn used by omapfb and omap v4l2 driver.
> > >
> > >
> > > So... Should I just remove the sdrc.h dependency and make vrfb.c ioremap
> > > those SMS registers itself? Those three registers are VRFB specific, so
> > > they are not used by anyone else. In that case I'd need to pass the SMS
> > > base address to vrfb.c somehow.
> > >
> > > Or should I have some kind of platform data passed to vrfb.c, which
> > > contains func pointers to the above three functions?
> > >
> > > Or should vrfb.c be moved into mach-omap2/? But then how would omapfb
> > > call it? Passing vrfb functions as pointers in omapfb platform data?
> >
> > Maybe just export those functions in sdrc.c for now? Eventually
> > that should be just a regular device driver too..
>
> Actually, if you're only using it to save and restore the hw
> context, why don't you let mach-omap2/sdrc.c do it based on runtime
> PM calls? It already has omap2_sms_save/restore_context.
No, the functions are used to configure the rotation parameters whenever
the user asks for a new rotation.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-04 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-28 12:04 Converting vrfb.c Tomi Valkeinen
2012-09-28 15:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-03 18:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-04 10:18 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-10-04 16:33 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349345938.32558.0.camel@lappyti \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).