From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: dra7xx: Fix compatible string for PCF8575 chip Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 19:23:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1462386203.2360.12.camel@codethink.co.uk> References: <1461588834-20908-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1461588834-20908-1-git-send-email-rogerq-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Roger Quadros Cc: tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org, grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org, linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 15:53 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > The boards use a TI variant of the PCF8575 so specify that > in the compatible string. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros [...] 1. This compatible string is still not documented (AFAIK). 2. As I understand it, TI is a second source for this NXP-designed chip, i.e. it manufactures chips with identical logic (not clones) under license. They should not be distinguishable in software. 3. For the same reason, there is no guarantee that the board manufacturer won't populate boards with PCF8575 chips from the other source in future. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Software Developer, Codethink Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html