* [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Remove CPU_THERMAL Dependency from TI_THERMAL
@ 2017-01-16 10:13 Keerthy
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2017-01-16 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: edubezval
Cc: linux-omap, t-kristo, linux-kernel, linux-pm, rui.zhang,
j-keerthy
Currently when CPU_THERMAL is not defined the thermal sensors
are not even exposed consequently no cooling is possible. CPU_THERMAL
eventually depends on CPUFREQ. CPPUFREQ is not the only cooling
for CPU.
The thermal shutdown for critical temperatures is another
cooling solution which will currently not get enabled if CPU_THERMAL
is not defined. Remove this dependency so as to have the last level
of thermal protection working even without CPUFREQ defined.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
index ea8283f..fe0e877 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ config TI_SOC_THERMAL
config TI_THERMAL
bool "Texas Instruments SoCs thermal framework support"
depends on TI_SOC_THERMAL
- depends on CPU_THERMAL
help
If you say yes here you want to get support for generic thermal
framework for the Texas Instruments on die bandgap temperature sensor.
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-01-16 10:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-16 10:13 [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Remove CPU_THERMAL Dependency from TI_THERMAL Keerthy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).