linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in smsc_i2c_probe()
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:51:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b29f010-5617-3862-23f5-42a5e6a1bc81@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4eaf0b4-e539-b400-c8a2-70f210cee1fa@users.sourceforge.net>

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 14:14:54 +0200

The variable "ret" will be set to an appropriate value a bit later.
Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c b/drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c
index 7f89e89..2aaf89f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static int smsc_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 {
 	struct smsc *smsc;
 	int devid, rev, venid_l, venid_h;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	smsc = devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(struct smsc),
 				GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.9.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-26 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
2015-12-29 18:34 ` [PATCH] mfd: twl-core: One function call less in add_numbered_child() after error detection SF Markus Elfring
2016-01-11  8:29   ` Lee Jones
2016-05-15 18:11     ` [PATCH 0/2] mfd: twl-core: Fine-tuning for add_numbered_child() SF Markus Elfring
2016-05-16  6:26       ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: twl-core: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc() in add_numbered_child() SF Markus Elfring
2016-05-16  6:51         ` Julia Lawall
2016-05-16  7:54           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-05-16  8:07             ` Julia Lawall
2016-05-17  6:00               ` Lee Jones
2016-05-17 14:15                 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-05-16  6:28       ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: twl-core: Refactoring for add_numbered_child() SF Markus Elfring
2016-06-08 11:14         ` Lee Jones
2016-06-26 13:34           ` [PATCH 0/6] mfd: Fine-tuning for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2016-06-26 13:45             ` [PATCH 1/6] mfd: twl-core: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc() in add_numbered_child() SF Markus Elfring
2016-06-28 15:02               ` Lee Jones
2016-06-26 13:47             ` [PATCH 2/6] mfd: twl-core: Refactoring for add_numbered_child() SF Markus Elfring
2016-06-28 15:03               ` Lee Jones
2016-06-26 13:48             ` [PATCH 3/6] mfd: dm355evm_msp: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc() in add_child() SF Markus Elfring
2016-06-28 15:03               ` Lee Jones
2016-06-26 13:50             ` [PATCH 4/6] mfd: dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child() SF Markus Elfring
2016-06-28 15:07               ` Lee Jones
2016-06-28 15:40                 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-06-28 16:31                   ` Lee Jones
2016-06-26 13:51             ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2016-06-28 15:07               ` [PATCH 5/6] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in smsc_i2c_probe() Lee Jones
2016-06-26 13:54             ` [PATCH 6/6] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Return directly after a function failure " SF Markus Elfring
2016-06-28 15:08               ` Lee Jones
2016-06-28 15:01             ` [PATCH 0/6] mfd: Fine-tuning for three function implementations Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b29f010-5617-3862-23f5-42a5e6a1bc81@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).