linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Subject: RE: Integration branch base switchover to Tony's omap-for-linus branch
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:38:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f74aa62f12f632acff9d31082a1ec9e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D76591A.7060508@ti.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cousson, Benoit [mailto:b-cousson@ti.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 9:58 PM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Cc: Paul Walmsley; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Nayak, Rajendra;
> Hilman, Kevin
> Subject: Re: Integration branch base switchover to Tony's omap-for-
> linus branch
>
> On 3/8/2011 4:16 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > Paul,
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Santosh Shilimkar [mailto:santosh.shilimkar@ti.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 10:14 PM
> >> To: Rajendra Nayak
> >> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Benoit Cousson; Paul Walmsley
> >> Subject: RE: Integration branch base switchover to Tony's omap-
> for-
> >> linus branch
> >>
> >
> >   [....]
> >
> >>> Some more debugging by the Hardware team and analyzing
> >>> the register dumps showed that the I2C_WE register of the i2c
> >>> modules needs to be programmed correctly for i2c wakeups to
> >>> function as expected.
> >>> This turned out to be the root cause for the i2c issues observed
> >>> by clearing the staticdeps and a patch has been posted
> >>> to address this...
> >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129924557219813&w=2
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Also some more testing showed up a lockup in suspend on OMAP4
> >>> which I
> >>>> could narrow down to a similar case with GPT1. Either keeping
> >> the
> >>>> staticdep between MPU and L4_WKUP _or_ forcing GPT1 to use
> >>> software
> >>>> idle control seems to help.
> >>>
> >>> This however is still not rootcaused and is not the same as the
> >>> issue
> >>> seen with i2c as the WE for GPT1 is already programmed for
> >> enabling
> >>> wakeup.
> >>>
> >>> The one way to fix this for now is to put GPT1 block in software
> >>> controlled idle as was done by your test patch for i2c.
> >>>
> >> I tried all the floating patches for static dependency. It did
> >> worked when CPU RET was tried but with MPU OFF I see the hang.
> >>
> >> Below is the global hack I have which works as expected for
> >> all cases.
> >>
> > Thanks to Rajendra for isolating the OMAP4 MPU OFF issue
> > with static dependency series. The issue is isolated
> > to MPU<->  EMIF clock dependency.  There issue appears
> > if we clear this static dependency.
> >
> > I have posted a patch to work-around this issue till its
> > being root-caused with help of hardware team so that
> > OMAP4 PM series continue to work.
> >
> > 'OMAP4: PM: Set static dependency between MPUSS and EMIF'
> > http://www.listware.net/201103/linux-omap/2628-patch-omap4-pm-set-
> static-d
> > ependency-between-mpuss-and-emif.html
>
> Cool, so the timer1 fix is not longer needed?
>
We still need timer fix :(
In summary we need below fixes which came into light with
Static depdency series.

1. I2C: driver fix posted by Rajendra to enable I2C_WE.
2. Timer1: disable hardware-controlled idle
3. clockdomain: Follow PRCM recommended enable sequence
4. MPUSS<-> EMIF static dependency fix.

With above 4 patches instead of global hack of not
clearing static dependency, I tested OMAP4 PM series
and it works as expected.

Regards,
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-09  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-26  0:26 Integration branch base switchover to Tony's omap-for-linus branch Paul Walmsley
2011-03-01 12:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-01 21:33   ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-03 12:30     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-03-04 14:08       ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-03-04 14:59         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-04 15:01           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-04 15:25             ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-04 16:43         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-08 15:16           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-08 16:28             ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-09  5:08               ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-03-07 23:25         ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-08  8:04           ` Cousson, Benoit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1f74aa62f12f632acff9d31082a1ec9e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).