From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: Problem on mounting a jffs2 rootfs image Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:10:28 -0800 Message-ID: <20060102221028.GJ6034@atomide.com> References: <43741c56.6400405c.6f4c.ffff87c0@mx.gmail.com> <43743DC9.1090702@de.bosch.com> <20051111173755.GC10822@atomide.com> <4374F44A.7080807@de.bosch.com> <20060102183107.GH6034@atomide.com> <43B98EA2.9040509@de.bosch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43B98EA2.9040509@de.bosch.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces+gplao-linux-omap-open-source=gmane.org@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces+gplao-linux-omap-open-source=gmane.org@linux.omap.com To: Dirk Behme Cc: 'Linux OMAP Open Source' List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Dirk Behme [060102 12:36]: > Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>0x30003361 is the value used by spectrum digital. Seems to work. But I > >>don't think it's the fastest possible timing. Anybody with a better CS3 > >>timing? > > > > > >I think we should push this to avoid postings on JFFS2 problems. How > >about changing the patch to use the EMIFS_CCS macro instead? > > Something like this? This should do it: if (EMIFS_CCS(3) != EMIFS_CS3_VAL) EMIFS_CCS(3) = EMIFS_CS3_VAL; It's a REG32 define. > Nobody with a better timing? I guess not. Tony