From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juha =?iso-8859-1?B?WXJq9mzk?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] keypad refresh2 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:26:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20060124212636.GA7275@two.research.nokia.com> References: <20060122221251.GA1068@two.research.nokia.com> <20060123144319.89522.qmail@web32910.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060123170347.GB6263@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060123170347.GB6263@atomide.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: ext Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:03:47AM -0800, ext Tony Lindgren wrote: > > The first H4 board came out from TI was not having Menelaus chip. And > > gpio signals were changed in the H4 EVM came out with Menelaus for > > keypad. So only way to differentiate between the two was Menelaus chip > > on the new board. > > How about just adding && machine_is_omap_h4() there too? This check should be performed in the board-specific code, i.e. in board-h4.c. The data passed to the keyboard driver should be modified there. Cheers, Juha