public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
To: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix checking for multiple boot tags in board config.
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 16:58:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060407155818.GV22929@earth.li> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1144425015.19066.20.camel@bitbox.mine.nu>

On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:50:15PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 16:00 +0100, ext Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > Currently if we look for more than one instance of a boot tag and it's
> > defined in the board config rather than passed by the boot loader we can
> > get stuck in a loop where the same tag is processed many times. This can
> > be seen with the gpio-switch driver, for example. The patch below fixes
> > this by respecting the skip parameter to get_config when we're scanning
> > the board config structure.
> > 
> > Signed-Off-By: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
> > index 0625df5..39ab667 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
> > @@ -114,8 +114,12 @@ static const void *get_config(u16 tag, s
> >  	 * in the kernel. */
> >  	for (i = 0; i < omap_board_config_size; i++) {
> >  		if (omap_board_config[i].tag == tag) {
> > -			kinfo = &omap_board_config[i];
> > -			break;
> > +			if (skip == 0) {
> > +				kinfo = &omap_board_config[i];
> > +				break;
> > +			} else {
> > +				skip--;
> > +			}
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  	if (kinfo == NULL)
> 
> Should the case be handled when a configuration is present in both the
> boot tag and the board config? If so, we should stop parsing after the
> boot tags whenever the requested tag is found, even if there are less
> then 'skip' instances of it, and return NULL.

If a config option that can appear multiple times (ie when the skip
option would apply) is present in both the boot tag and board config I'd
expect both to have effect. You might have some instances of a device
that exist on all variants of the board (that would be in the board
config) and then some additional instances that would be controlled by
the boot tags passed by the boot loader. Though equally I can see the
argument for the other way when you'd want to override the defaults. :)

J.

-- 
 [    101 things you can't have too much of : 46 - Clinton jokes.     ]
 [ http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ - IPv6 enabled ADSL/dialup/colo ]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-07 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-07 15:00 [PATCH] Fix checking for multiple boot tags in board config Jonathan McDowell
2006-04-07 15:50 ` Imre Deak
2006-04-07 15:58   ` Jonathan McDowell [this message]
2006-04-08  7:58     ` Imre Deak
2006-05-15  9:44       ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060407155818.GV22929@earth.li \
    --to=noodles@earth.li \
    --cc=linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox