Re: is dynamic tick working?

[David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>]

On Sunday 14 May 2006 10:57 am, Imre Deak wrote:
> 	 The patch is already in the mainline 
> tree, I've also sent it to Tony after I noticed it's missing from the 
> OMAP tree. My fault, I should've kept the driver up-to-date in both trees..

Understandable, given how long it took to get those patches merged
upstream!  Plus the fact that the version in the OMAP tree was working
around byteswap bugs on the Microwire SPI driver ... I'm not sure I'd
have expected Tony to resolve all the merge conflicts right unless he
were more involved in sorting out those issues.

So let's see.  Other than those recent patches resolving those byteswap
bugs, and the hwmon features (not all merged upstream yet, sigh), are
there any reasons left for the OMAP version of that driver to differ from
the upstream one?

My understanding is that thanks (!) mostly to your updates, we're almost
ready to say OMAP can use the same version of ads7846 that's upstream,
and that the omap_uwire driver could also go upstream.  And given an OSK
version of that new routine, that Mistral support could also go upstream.
Does that sound right?

- Dave