Re: is dynamic tick working?

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Imre Deak <imre.deak@nokia.com> [060514 13:31]:
> ext David Brownell wrote:
> >On Sunday 14 May 2006 10:57 am, Imre Deak wrote:
> >>	 The patch is already in the mainline 
> >>tree, I've also sent it to Tony after I noticed it's missing from the 
> >>OMAP tree. My fault, I should've kept the driver up-to-date in both 
> >>trees..
> >
> >Understandable, given how long it took to get those patches merged
> >upstream!  Plus the fact that the version in the OMAP tree was working
> >around byteswap bugs on the Microwire SPI driver ... I'm not sure I'd
> >have expected Tony to resolve all the merge conflicts right unless he
> >were more involved in sorting out those issues.
> 
> Yep, to make it work I fixed the thing in the wrong place.
> 
> >
> >So let's see.  Other than those recent patches resolving those byteswap
> >bugs, and the hwmon features (not all merged upstream yet, sigh), are
> >there any reasons left for the OMAP version of that driver to differ from
> >the upstream one?
> 
> No, they must be in sync now. Since the changes went to mainline and to 
> the OMAP tree through different changesets (b/c the above wrong fix et 
> al) and now the OMAP version is out of sync, I've sent a patchset to 
> Tony to bring it up-to-date.
> 
> >
> >My understanding is that thanks (!) mostly to your updates, we're almost
> >ready to say OMAP can use the same version of ads7846 that's upstream,
> >and that the omap_uwire driver could also go upstream.  And given an OSK
> >version of that new routine, that Mistral support could also go upstream.
> >Does that sound right?
> 
> Yes, the ads7846 and omap_uwire should be ok - and identical with 
> upstream after the above patches.

OK, I've pushed Imre's patches. Can you check that everything got
patched OK?

Regards,

Tony