From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: is dynamic tick working? Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:59:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20060516065945.GF3413@atomide.com> References: <200605121905.13405.david-b@pacbell.net> <446793B2.6040408@nokia.com> <20060515092253.GD8368@atomide.com> <200605151511.11836.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605151511.11836.david-b@pacbell.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: David Brownell Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * David Brownell [060515 15:11]: > On Monday 15 May 2006 2:22 am, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > OK, I've pushed Imre's patches. Can you check that everything got > > patched OK? > > I attach three patches: > > - To make Mistral work better needs new callback), which worked for > me (modulo writing the "disable" file wedging, gotta retest that); I'll push this patch today. > - A quickie bitbang SPI adapter for the 1510-Innovator FPGA hookup to ads7846, > untested beyond compiling (no Innovator here!); > > - Removing the old OMAP-specific Mistral and Innovator touchscreen drivers; > this may be a trifle premature given the lack of Innovator testing Let's try these patches out before pushing. Can somebody with an Innovator test these patches? > Anyway, with the first of these patches I saw tick rates of about 27 Hz; > the issue seems to be the omap_ts driver keeping a timer active (among > other misbehaviors). > > In short: yes, it's better now. AFAIK omap_ts should only need a timer when pen is down. Tony