From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: omap1710 upstream ?
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 00:32:03 -0700
Message-ID: <20060518073202.GB4013@atomide.com>
References: <1147890163.13483.6.camel@dwalker1.mvista.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1147890163.13483.6.camel@dwalker1.mvista.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.omap.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-omap-open-source>,
	<mailto:linux-omap-open-source-request@linux.omap.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/linux-omap-open-source>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-omap-open-source-request@linux.omap.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.omap.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-omap-open-source>,
	<mailto:linux-omap-open-source-request@linux.omap.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com
Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> [060517 11:22]:
> 
> 	I was wondering if there was any time frame when omap1710 might be
> going upstream ? Is there still work that needs to be done to make it
> acceptable , or is it just not a top priority ?

In our tree omap1710 is mostly same as omap16xx. There are only few
places where we need to check for omap1710 vs omap16xx.

Most of the core omap code is in sync with mainline tree. Many device
drivers are not integrated yet.

Regards,

Tony