Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: OMAP_GPIO_SWITCH doesn't need OMAP_BOOT_TAG

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li> [060518 02:19]:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:25:47PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > I can't see any reason why OMAP_GPIO_SWITCH depends on OMAP_BOOT_TAG;
> > it compiles fine without it. This patch removes the Kconfig dependency.
> 
> Here's an updated patch that not only removes the dependency but cleans
> up the Kconfig description to talk about sysfs rather than the input
> layer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
> 
> -----
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
> index 28ca5ad..cc8c793 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
> @@ -57,13 +57,12 @@ config OMAP_COMPONENT_VERSION
>  
>  config OMAP_GPIO_SWITCH
>  	bool "GPIO switch support"
> -        depends on OMAP_BOOT_TAG
>          default n
>          help
> -          Say Y, if you want to have support for input layer reporting
> -          of GPIO switches (e.g. cover switches). Your bootloader has to
> -          provide information about the switches to the kernel via the
> -          ATAG_BOARD mechanism.
> +          Say Y, if you want to have support for reporting of GPIO
> +          switches (e.g. cover switches) via sysfs. Your bootloader has
> +          to provide information about the switches to the kernel via the
> +          ATAG_BOARD mechanism if they're not defined by the board config.
>  
>  config OMAP_MUX
>  	bool "OMAP multiplexing support"

Pushing today. This allows us also to integrate the gpio switch into the
mainline kernel.

Tony