From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP audio DMA changes for 310 CPUs Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:05:21 +0300 Message-ID: <20060912120520.GE22547@atomide.com> References: <44E5F3CE.3010501@cc.jyu.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces+gplao-linux-omap-open-source=gmane.org@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces+gplao-linux-omap-open-source=gmane.org@linux.omap.com To: balrogg@gmail.com Cc: Linux-OMAP List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * andrzej zaborowski [060912 12:54]: > On 18/08/06, lamikr wrote: > >Hi andrzej > > > >I have couple of questions from your patch. > >Your patch has couple of these changes where cpu_is_omap1510() has been > >changed to cpu_is_omap15xx(). > > - if (!cpu_is_omap1510()) > > + if (!cpu_is_omap15xx()) > > > >Do they affect to the sound in omap 310? (I mean is cpu_is_omap15xx() > >true for your omap310) > >Or is following the only relevant omap310 specific change > > > > + } else if (cpu_is_omap310()) > > + omap_start_dma(channel); > > > >Btw, your patch will not apply on top of all 5 patches I sent. > >Could you perhaps re-send it one more time? (I need also test whether > >your changes could work with omap1510/h6300) > > Ok, this one applies on top of the five alsa patches. Sorry for the delay. Pushing this today. Tony