From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
Cc: Ladislav Michl <ladis@mips-linux.cz>,
linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Fix warning in clock.c
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:52:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061006125230.GK32423@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45250702.2030806@gmail.com>
* Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com> [061005 16:28]:
> Ladislav Michl wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 03:28:43PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> >
> >>Fix warning
> >>
> >>arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c: In function
> >>'omap1_clk_enable_generic':
> >>arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c:499: warning: 'return' with no
> >>value, in function returning non-void
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme_at_gmail.com>
> >>
> >
> >>--- ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c_orig 2006-10-04
> >>15:07:39.000000000 +0200
> >>+++ ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c 2006-10-04 15:09:41.000000000 +0200
> >>@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int omap1_clk_enable_generic(stru
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >>- return;
> >>+ return 0;
> >>}
> >
> >
> >Does it make sense to return any vaule at all? This functions return
> >always 0. Perhaps in case there is no enable reg it should return
> >something else. Btw, can this code run on omap2 cpu?
>
> What's about something like in attachment?
>
> --- ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c_orig 2006-10-05 15:10:17.000000000 +0200
> +++ ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c 2006-10-05 15:14:26.000000000 +0200
> @@ -432,8 +432,7 @@ static int omap1_clk_enable(struct clk *
> }
>
> if (clk->flags & CLOCK_NO_IDLE_PARENT)
> - if (!cpu_is_omap24xx())
> - omap1_clk_deny_idle(clk->parent);
> + omap1_clk_deny_idle(clk->parent);
> }
>
> ret = clk->enable(clk);
> @@ -454,8 +453,7 @@ static void omap1_clk_disable(struct clk
> if (likely(clk->parent)) {
> omap1_clk_disable(clk->parent);
> if (clk->flags & CLOCK_NO_IDLE_PARENT)
> - if (!cpu_is_omap24xx())
> - omap1_clk_allow_idle(clk->parent);
> + omap1_clk_allow_idle(clk->parent);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -471,7 +469,7 @@ static int omap1_clk_enable_generic(stru
> if (unlikely(clk->enable_reg == 0)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "clock.c: Enable for %s without enable code\n",
> clk->name);
> - return 0;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if (clk->flags & ENABLE_REG_32BIT) {
> @@ -496,7 +494,7 @@ static int omap1_clk_enable_generic(stru
> }
> }
>
> - return;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void omap1_clk_disable_generic(struct clk *clk)
>
Pushed this one too.
Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-06 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-04 13:28 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Fix warning in clock.c Dirk Behme
2006-10-05 7:48 ` Ladislav Michl
2006-10-05 13:22 ` Dirk Behme
2006-10-06 12:52 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061006125230.GK32423@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=ladis@mips-linux.cz \
--cc=linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox