From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: OMAP I2C - probe question Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:11:40 -0800 Message-ID: <200612041311.40802.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <9C23CDD79DA20A479D4615857B2E2C4702AEA6@dlee13.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9C23CDD79DA20A479D4615857B2E2C4702AEA6@dlee13.ent.ti.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org There seems to be rather more interest in a later series of patches I posted: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2006-November/000516.html The first part of that is cleanups. The second half adds a "new style" model for driver binding, which doesn't need SMBUS_QUICK probing. That said, I've suspected that the "controller can't do SMBUS_QUICK" issue is something that TI should fix. - Dave