From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.19] omap camera builds again; Mistral hooks Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:57:37 -0800 Message-ID: <20061221225737.GG10399@atomide.com> References: <20061207034509.5BC701E771D@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> <200612070558.19023.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <20061211222134.GG31722@atomide.com> <200612141239.39491.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612141239.39491.david-b@pacbell.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: David Brownell Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * David Brownell [061214 12:40]: > On Monday 11 December 2006 2:21 pm, tony@atomide.com wrote: > > * Marek Va=C5=A1ut [061206 20:59]: > > > Hi, just a small typo ... > > > static char banner[] __initdata =3D KERN_INFO "OMAP Camera driver=20 > > > initialzing\n"; ... should be initializing ;-) > >=20 > > Pushed in two parts, one for the core changes, and the other patch > > for the driver. I had to manually apply some parts of the driver > > patch. Dave, can you please check that your changes got applied? >=20 > I can "patch -R" my version with only a reject on the last half of > the camera_core.c changes ... and eyeballing that, I didn't see > any obvious breakage, I think it's whitespace. It still says it's > getting its "initial zing" though. ;) Fixing today :) Tony