From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Fix ethernet IRQF_TRIGGER flag for apollon Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:26:16 -0800 Message-ID: <20061222202616.GJ2449@atomide.com> References: <17512019.399221166767051091.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml29> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17512019.399221166767051091.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml29> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: Kyungmin Park Cc: "linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Kyungmin Park [061221 21:57]: > > > Yeah, I believe the omap level gpios should work fine too. Kyungmin, > > do you have some special interrupt routing for your smc91x? Or do you > > see this only with the RT patches applied? > > Yes It's problem on only RT environment. > But I think it's safe to set IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING instead of IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH. even though it is level-sensive. OK, let's patch it and try to figure out later why GPIO level interrupts don't work prorperly with RT patches. Tony