public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1 merge status
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:20:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070220092009.GD14954@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45D892A1.9040006@googlemail.com>

Hi,

* Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com> [070218 09:54]:
> 
> 2) Merging our OMAP patches via Russells patch system to 
> mainline failed [2]. There was some background discussion 
> between Tony, Russell and Andrew how to merge our patches in 
> last week. Tony sent some updated patches based on Russells 
> comments, but it was too much for Russell for a proper 
> review. Russell mentioned ~17klines of changes.

Yes, it's a big pile of patches :)
 
> Now, we have to find a proper way how to get our (at the 
> moment) large changes merged upstream. Looks like getting 
> everything merged in the usual two week merge window isn't 
> possible. First we should remove our patchset from Russells 
> incoming queue and then discuss how to go on.

Yeah, Andrew Morton suggested that we post the linux-omap patch series
to appropriate mailing lists for larger review. I will post the patch
series to LKML few weeks before 2.6.22 opens for review, and will also
notify the linux-arm-kernel list asking for people to comment on it.

There are some patches that can be already sent as fixes against
2.6.21-rxX, so that will cut down the size of the patch series a bit.

As we're trying to have all the core omap code in sync with mainline
kernel, I'd like to start using branches in our linux-omap tree to
make things easier.

Here's what I see working pretty nicely with branches in linux-omap tree:

Linus' mainline tree
\
 omap-fixes                            (Fixes for 2.6.21-rcX)
           \
            omap-upstream              (Queue for when 2.6.22 opens) 
                         \
                          omap-drivers (Patches to send to driver lists)
                                      \
                                       linux-omap (Non mergeable hacks)
 
So to checkout the current linux-omap tree, you would just use
"git-checkout linux-omap" instead of checking out the master branch as
we currently do.

This way we can easily rebase the branches against the mainline tree
using git-rebase command. Please also note that we can add other temporary
branches between the branches above if necessary.

I'll try to set this up this week to try it out, and then we can
change over to it next week assuming there are no problems.

Regards,

Tony

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-20  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-18 17:53 2.6.21-rc1 merge status Dirk Behme
2007-02-19 18:39 ` David Brownell
2007-02-20  9:20 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070220092009.GD14954@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox