From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move N800 specific OneNand setup to N800 platform file, was: Basic N800 support Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 03:57:55 -0800 Message-ID: <20070307115754.GH21093@atomide.com> References: <13020905.97851169452503947.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml23> <20070122171254.GD7382@atomide.com> <20070206213648.GH9311@atomide.com> <000101c74a77$39e94120$c7a3580a@swcenter.sec.samsung.co.kr> <20070301134533.GA15801@angel.research.nokia.com> <00a901c75c64$01b1e830$c7a3580a@swcenter.sec.samsung.co.kr> <20070302164855.GA313@angel.research.nokia.com> <45EA99D0.8010103@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EA99D0.8010103@googlemail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: Dirk Behme Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com, Kyungmin Park List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Dirk Behme [070304 02:11]: > Jarkko Lavinen wrote: > >>If you don't need async mode settings, it also don't need it. > > > >Yes. It is obvious. Removed async part. New patch attached. > > Are there any dependencies to apply this patch I missed? I > tried to apply it on top of 01-onenand.patch posted by Tony > [1] but got rejects. > > If not, sligthly modified patch that cleanly applies on top > of [1] in attachment. I additionally removed duplication of > omap2_onenand_readw and writew. Can you please test if it is > still okay? ;) I've pushed Jarkko's onenand patches as two parts: omap-drivers: onenand support for omap2 that can be sent to mtd list omap-upstream: onenand board specific support for n800 Can you all please verify that they're OK? Kyungmin & Dirk, do you have some additional patches on top of Jarkko's patches? Regards, Tony > [1] > http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/linux-omap-open-source/2007-January/008958.html