RE: [PATCH] Move N800 specific OneNand setup to N800 platform file, was: Basic N800 support

Kyungmin Park
2007-03-08T09:34:06Z

> >
> > * Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com> [070304 02:11]:
> > > Jarkko Lavinen wrote:
> > > >>If you don't need async mode settings, it also don't need it.
> > > >
> > > >Yes. It is obvious. Removed async part. New patch attached.
> > >
> > > Are there any dependencies to apply this patch I missed?
> I tried to
> > > apply it on top of 01-onenand.patch posted by Tony [1] but got
> > > rejects.
> > >
> > > If not, sligthly modified patch that cleanly applies on top
> > of [1] in
> > > attachment. I additionally removed duplication of
> > omap2_onenand_readw
> > > and writew. Can you please test if it is still okay? ;)
> >
> > I've pushed Jarkko's onenand patches as two parts:
> >
> > omap-drivers: onenand support for omap2 that can be sent to mtd list
>
> I will push it mtd list

Umm, there's omap tree dependency.
omap2_block_sleep() & omap2_allow_sleep().

It just increase and decrease sleep_block variable atomically

Just remove it or define dummy macro?

Please give your opinions.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park