Re: Pending March patches

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com> [070404 10:06]:
> From: "ext Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>
> Subject: Re: Pending March patches
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:04:51 -0400
> 
> > > Though I don't know how to deal with dspgw code, I guess, at least,
> > > "mailbox" and "mmu fw" can be merged into mainline?
> > 
> > Yes, ideally we would have DSP power on/off, mailbox, mmu fw in
> > plat-omap.
> > 
> > Then I suggest we move the rest of the DSP code into drivers/dsp/omap.
> > 
> > I don't think we can get the arch/arm/plat-omap/dsp integrated to
> > the mainline. So the chances of getting it integrated would be better
> > under drivers/dsp/omap.
> > 
> > What are your thoughts on that? I'm thinking that we could do it few
> > weeks after 2.6.21 after a stable 2.6.21-omap release.
> 
> Agreed. It would be cleaner and easy to handle other implementation also.

OK. I'll drop the "ARM: OMAP: Add DSP common code" patch from
omap-upstream for now. Then we can put together the minimal DSP init
patch later on for 2.6.23 or something. The omap-upstream queue is
already painfully big :)

What do you think we should keep in plat-omap?

Maybe just something to power up and idle the DSP, and allow using McBSP
for audio?

Tony