From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] WATCHDOG: use base address from platform resources and make 2430 boot again Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:30:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20070405133055.GD24297@atomide.com> References: <782515bb0704041855x4ff69d3bp19d386805eaecf16@mail.gmail.com> <5d5443650704050320t242adc8ak46c76cfbc69449ed@mail.gmail.com> <4614EF05.6050606@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4614EF05.6050606@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: Nishanth Menon Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Nishanth Menon [070405 08:44]: > Hi Trilok, > Thanks for your time in helping review the patch. :) > > Trilok Soni stated on 4/5/2007 5:20 AM: > > > > Changelog goes in the SCM metadata, not source files. Please avoid this. > Is this a new convention? No offence intended, but I like my signature > on the files I touch extensively.. since it is not denied by > coding_standards.txt, kinda pulling on leeway here.. :) The problem with this is that we will always get nailed on that trying to send the patches upstream, see current omap update on LKML right now for example. So we should generate patches that do not leave any reason for anybody to complain. Regards, Tony