From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: RMKs comments on latest OMAP upstream patches Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:59:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20070921015935.GA26096@atomide.com> References: <46F29DB0.9060203@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46F29DB0.9060203@googlemail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: Dirk Behme Cc: Linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Dirk Behme [070920 09:21]: > > Just fyi: Tony (thanks!) sent a OMAP1 and a OMAP2 patch to RMK for review > and upstream merge. Regarding OMAP1, there are some comments from RMK, > nothing yet for OMAP2: > > OMAP1: > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=4570/1 > > OMAP2: > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=4571/1 > > While -rc7 is out [1] and we are short before final 2.6.23 release with > merge window opening, we have to see if our patches will be merged. Yeh, I've removed the clock init RMK does not like, and will change them to use just struct clk *clk instead on the fbdevel list. Regards, Tony > [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/250570/