From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] Make the dev_*() family of macros in device.hcomplete Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:35:13 -0700 Message-ID: <20071102153513.GA7485@suse.de> References: <20071101165700.aa5167fb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <598D5675D34BE349929AF5EDE9B03E270174CCE0@az33exm24.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <598D5675D34BE349929AF5EDE9B03E270174CCE0@az33exm24.fsl.freescale.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hjlipp@web.de, tilman@imap.cc, gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net, kkeil@suse.de, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de, mac@melware.de, linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 04:59:48AM -0700, Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > > Thanks for the detailed background. > > By now I also submitted a patch with extra spaces. Which one would be a > better candidate for applying in a maintainer's tree (which tree?)? > Could you please pick up one of the versions? Should I resubmit the > first version without extra spaces? The second patch looks good to me, it's "safer" and I'll add it to my queue. thanks, greg k-h