From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: Nokia N810 support Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:10:48 -0800 Message-ID: <20071128021048.GC11825@atomide.com> References: <1195778318-12008-1-git-send-email-lauri.leukkunen@nokia.com> <1195808944.32096.11.camel@mort> <20071123014546.GA12883@pure.research.nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071123014546.GA12883@pure.research.nokia.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: Lauri Leukkunen Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Lauri Leukkunen [071123 06:29]: > On 23/11/07 11:09 +0200, Igor Stoppa wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 02:38 +0200, ext Lauri Leukkunen wrote: > > > This patch-set provides basic support for N810. Comments are welcome, > > > especially concerning structuring of the board-nXX.c files in the > > > future. > > > > Would it make sense to have just one common set of files for platforms > > that are almost identical and can run the same binaries? > > > > The Nokia product naming scheme might not help us, but what about > > board-nokia-2420.c ? > > I decided against renaming the board-n800*.c files to keep the patch > small. Also I think it is more obvious to use a real product name, instead of > a reference to the particular chip they're using. Let's see how this works > out. Right now the n800 files are effectively the common set, n810 will be > the product specific one. As we work on publishing the different drivers > maybe we'll evolve this towards board-nokia-2420. OK, pushing today. Tony