From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: ALSA support for H2 board Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:43:39 -0800 Message-ID: <200711301043.39503.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <462684.16917.qm@web34311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <462684.16917.qm@web34311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Friday 30 November 2007, Carlos Davila wrote: > David, > > I understood from your previous message: "Better IMO to get > the tsc210x core working on tsc2101 chips" that there are > bugs in the tsc2101 drivers used by ALSA...which leaves me No, it's just that the driver you referenced is using old driver infrastructure. That's not "bugs", it's just "this code needs updating". - Dave > no choice but to use OSS, since I know nothing about > debugging/writing device drivers. > > Am I completely off the mark? Would appreciate any suggestions you may have. > > Best, > Carlos > > David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 30 November 2007, Carlos Davila wrote: > > OK understood, I'll use OSS then. > > You seem to have leaped from "use a more modern SPI framework" > to "use old sound framework" ... how does that happen?? > > > > David Brownell wrote: > > On Thursday 29 November 2007, comunerito wrote: > > > CC [M] sound/arm/omap/omap-alsa-tsc2101.o > > > > Better IMO to get the tsc210x core working on tsc2101 chips... > > > > > > > >