From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP: Change MMU to use sysdev_class?
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 07:57:10 +0900
Message-ID: <20071203225710.GA15047@linux-sh.org>
References: <20071203222651.GE4105@atomide.com>
	<20071203224029.GF4105@atomide.com>
	<20071203225043.13E3723C959@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071203225043.13E3723C959@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.omap.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-omap-open-source>,
	<mailto:linux-omap-open-source-request@linux.omap.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/linux-omap-open-source>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-omap-open-source-request@linux.omap.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.omap.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-omap-open-source>,
	<mailto:linux-omap-open-source-request@linux.omap.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com
Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:50:42PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > What do you guys think? Should we change it, or keep using class device?
> 
> "struct class_device" is going to vanish ... but what I saw
> here was "struct class", which won't ...

If struct class is going to hang around, then it's certainly preferable
to keep using that. It's really the best match for this particular
problem.