From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP: Change MMU to use sysdev_class? Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:03:16 -0800 Message-ID: <20071203230315.GI4105@atomide.com> References: <20071203222651.GE4105@atomide.com> <20071203224029.GF4105@atomide.com> <20071203225043.13E3723C959@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> <20071203225710.GA15047@linux-sh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071203225710.GA15047@linux-sh.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: Paul Mundt Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Paul Mundt [071203 14:57]: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:50:42PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > > What do you guys think? Should we change it, or keep using class device? > > > > "struct class_device" is going to vanish ... but what I saw > > here was "struct class", which won't ... > > If struct class is going to hang around, then it's certainly preferable > to keep using that. It's really the best match for this particular > problem. OK, let's scrap the sysdev_class patch then. Tony