RE: [PATCH] dmtimer posting

Woodruff, Richard
2008-04-04T04:51:04Z

> >
> > In that variant I just added a load_start() function in addition to
the
> > load function and converted all the in tree callers to use this as
they
> > all called load() then start() in order anyway. This left the API
> > behavior the same but optimized all current users.
>
> Can you send a patch against l-o tree for the load_start()? That might
> be optimized enough :)

Sure, I'll see about it hopefully tomorrow.

Regards,
Richard W.