From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/17] ARM: OMAP2: Add common register access for 24xx
	and 34xx
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:39:58 -0700
Message-ID: <20080414173957.GC26832@atomide.com>
References: <1205848935-12078-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <1205848935-12078-2-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <1205848935-12078-3-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <1205848935-12078-4-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <20080407162049.GF5306@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20080409205005.GL31071@atomide.com> <20080414140515.GD8578@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mho-01-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.178]:56627 "EHLO
	mho-01-bos.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1763636AbYDNRkI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:40:08 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080414140515.GD8578@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [080414 07:05]:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 08:50:06PM +0000, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks for looking through this big set, I'll repost the series
> > with your comments fixed.
> > 
> > Few comments below on what was changed.
> > 
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [080407 16:21]:
> > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 04:02:01PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm.h
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..f575a87
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
> > > > +/* Clock management global register get/set */
> > > > +
> > > > +static void __attribute__((unused)) cm_write_reg(u32 val, void __iomem *addr)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	pr_debug("cm_write_reg: writing 0x%0x to 0x%0x\n", val, (u32)addr);
> > > > +
> > > > +	__raw_writel(val, addr);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static u32 __attribute__((unused)) cm_read_reg(void __iomem *addr)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return __raw_readl(addr);
> > > > +}
> > > > +#endif
> > > 
> > > Erm, code in a header file?  Make them __inline__ or if you really want
> > > to have them as separate functions, put them in a .c file.
> > > 
> > > Next point - what's the purpose of them.  They're doing nothing (apart
> > > from that excess debug statement).
> > 
> > I've made them __inline__ and removed extra debug stuff from these
> > functions.
> 
> This should be:
> 
> +static inline void cm_write_reg(u32 val, void __iomem *addr)
> +{
> +	pr_debug("cm_write_reg: writing 0x%0x to 0x%0x\n", val, (u32)addr);
> +
> +	__raw_writel(val, addr);
> +}
> 
> IOW, without the __attribute__ mess or using the __inline__.

Alright, changed to use just static inline.

Tony