Re: [PATCH 4/5] OMAP3xx: Add DMA and IRQ definition for McBSP 1 and 2

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Gadiyar, Anand <gadiyar@ti.com> [080424 22:12]:
> <snip>
> > diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/dma.h
> > b/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/dma.h
> > index be0431e..270e158 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/dma.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/dma.h
> > @@ -273,6 +273,10 @@
> >  #define OMAP24XX_DMA_MS                      63      /* S_DMA_62 */
> >  #define OMAP242X_DMA_EXT_DMAREQ5     64      /* S_DMA_63 */
> >  #define OMAP243X_DMA_EXT_DMAREQ6     64      /* S_DMA_63 */
> > +#define OMAP34XX_DMA_MCBSP1_TX               31      /* S_DMA_30 */
> > +#define OMAP34XX_DMA_MCBSP1_RX               32      /* S_DMA_31 */
> > +#define OMAP34XX_DMA_MCBSP2_TX               33      /* S_DMA_32 */
> > +#define OMAP34XX_DMA_MCBSP2_RX               34      /* S_DMA_33 */
> >  #define OMAP34XX_DMA_EXT_DMAREQ3     64      /* S_DMA_63 */
> >  #define OMAP34XX_DMA_AES2_TX         65      /* S_DMA_64 */
> >  #define OMAP34XX_DMA_AES2_RX         66      /* S_DMA_65 */
> 
> What's the point of this patch? Can't you use OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP* names?
>
> > diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h
> > b/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h
> > index 15446fd..4e185a8 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h
> > @@ -316,7 +316,11 @@
> >  #define INT_34XX_USIM_IRQ    35
> >  #define INT_34XX_WDT3_IRQ    36
> >  #define INT_34XX_SPI4_IRQ    48
> > +#define INT_34XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_TX       59
> > +#define INT_34XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_RX       60
> >  #define INT_34XX_I2C3_IRQ    61
> > +#define INT_34XX_MCBSP2_IRQ_TX       62
> > +#define INT_34XX_MCBSP2_IRQ_RX       63
> >  #define INT_34XX_PBIAS_IRQ   75
> >  #define INT_34XX_OHCI_IRQ    76
> >  #define INT_34XX_EHCI_IRQ    77
> 
> Ditto with the IRQ lines?
> 
> @Tony,
> It would be nice to give people some time to take a look at the patches before they get pushed.

Sorry, it seemed like a safe patch to push. I will revert it
today.

In general, I try to keep patches floating on the mailing list for
few days so people can review them.

Regards,

Tony