FW: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/14] more assorted stuff for 2.6.26-rc1

FW: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/14] more assorted stuff for 2.6.26-rc1

[Woodruff, Richard]

Tony,

Would you participate in this?

Regards,
Richard W. 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.arm.linux.org.uk 
> [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.arm.linux.org.uk] On 
> Behalf Of Nicolas Pitre
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 4:29 PM
> To: Andrew Morton
> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux; linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/14] more assorted stuff for 2.6.26-rc1
> 
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > They are, of course, what I refer to as private trees.  For 
> want of a 
> > better term.  I believe that probably your misundertanding was 
> > deliberate and certainly your obtusensss is deliberate.
> > 
> > No progress is being made here.
> 
> OK.  Progress you want? Let's go for it.
> 
> Unless someone else steps forward for the job, I'm going to 
> gather every one else's ARM related git tree into one, and 
> push for that combined repository to be merged into 
> linux-next.  I'll include my stuff (obviously), RMK's stuff 
> (git will cope if the same changes come from different 
> paths), Catalin's stuff, and anyone with a Git tree who sends 
> me a request.  That is also good for those i.mx folks who are 
> complaining about the lack of attention for their patches, etc. etc.
> 
> The requirements are:
> 
>  - it must be a git repository accessible through the git:// protocol;
> 
>  - the tree must build;
> 
>  - it must merge easily with what I already have;
> 
>  - it will be excluded with notification if it causes 
> problems upstream 
>    until those problems are resolved and a new request is sent to me;
> 
>  - I may change those requirements as I see fit.
> 
> What about this?  What do people think?
> 
> 
> Nicolas
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> List admin: 
> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> FAQ:        http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
> Etiquette:  http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
> 

Re: FW: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/14] more assorted stuff for 2.6.26-rc1

[Tony Lindgren]

* Woodruff, Richard <r-woodruff2@ti.com> [080428 15:02]:
> Tony,
> 
> Would you participate in this?

Sure, that will help to see any upcoming conflicts for omap-upstream
branches.

Tony

> Regards,
> Richard W. 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.arm.linux.org.uk 
> > [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.arm.linux.org.uk] On 
> > Behalf Of Nicolas Pitre
> > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 4:29 PM
> > To: Andrew Morton
> > Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux; linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/14] more assorted stuff for 2.6.26-rc1
> > 
> > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > They are, of course, what I refer to as private trees.  For 
> > want of a 
> > > better term.  I believe that probably your misundertanding was 
> > > deliberate and certainly your obtusensss is deliberate.
> > > 
> > > No progress is being made here.
> > 
> > OK.  Progress you want? Let's go for it.
> > 
> > Unless someone else steps forward for the job, I'm going to 
> > gather every one else's ARM related git tree into one, and 
> > push for that combined repository to be merged into 
> > linux-next.  I'll include my stuff (obviously), RMK's stuff 
> > (git will cope if the same changes come from different 
> > paths), Catalin's stuff, and anyone with a Git tree who sends 
> > me a request.  That is also good for those i.mx folks who are 
> > complaining about the lack of attention for their patches, etc. etc.
> > 
> > The requirements are:
> > 
> >  - it must be a git repository accessible through the git:// protocol;
> > 
> >  - the tree must build;
> > 
> >  - it must merge easily with what I already have;
> > 
> >  - it will be excluded with notification if it causes 
> > problems upstream 
> >    until those problems are resolved and a new request is sent to me;
> > 
> >  - I may change those requirements as I see fit.
> > 
> > What about this?  What do people think?
> > 
> > 
> > Nicolas
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > List admin: 
> > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> > FAQ:        http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
> > Etiquette:  http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
> >