From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: FW: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/14] more assorted stuff for 2.6.26-rc1 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:10:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20080428221009.GB8449@atomide.com> References: <3B6D69C3A9EBCA4BA5DA60D913027429042C59DB@dlee13.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.179]:58609 "EHLO mho-02-bos.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966108AbYD1WKN (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:10:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B6D69C3A9EBCA4BA5DA60D913027429042C59DB@dlee13.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Woodruff, Richard" Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Woodruff, Richard [080428 15:02]: > Tony, > > Would you participate in this? Sure, that will help to see any upcoming conflicts for omap-upstream branches. Tony > Regards, > Richard W. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.arm.linux.org.uk > > [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.arm.linux.org.uk] On > > Behalf Of Nicolas Pitre > > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 4:29 PM > > To: Andrew Morton > > Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux; linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk > > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/14] more assorted stuff for 2.6.26-rc1 > > > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > They are, of course, what I refer to as private trees. For > > want of a > > > better term. I believe that probably your misundertanding was > > > deliberate and certainly your obtusensss is deliberate. > > > > > > No progress is being made here. > > > > OK. Progress you want? Let's go for it. > > > > Unless someone else steps forward for the job, I'm going to > > gather every one else's ARM related git tree into one, and > > push for that combined repository to be merged into > > linux-next. I'll include my stuff (obviously), RMK's stuff > > (git will cope if the same changes come from different > > paths), Catalin's stuff, and anyone with a Git tree who sends > > me a request. That is also good for those i.mx folks who are > > complaining about the lack of attention for their patches, etc. etc. > > > > The requirements are: > > > > - it must be a git repository accessible through the git:// protocol; > > > > - the tree must build; > > > > - it must merge easily with what I already have; > > > > - it will be excluded with notification if it causes > > problems upstream > > until those problems are resolved and a new request is sent to me; > > > > - I may change those requirements as I see fit. > > > > What about this? What do people think? > > > > > > Nicolas > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > List admin: > > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > FAQ: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php > > Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php > >