* Re: [PATCH] Performance enhancement for MMCSD when feature CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled in the MMC core [not found] <B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB593010A9B60D4@dbde02.ent.ti.com> @ 2008-05-15 13:30 ` Felipe Balbi 2008-05-16 1:03 ` Kyungmin Park 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Felipe Balbi @ 2008-05-15 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kumar, Purushotam Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com, Gole, Anant, linux-omap Hi, this list moved to linux-omap@vger.kernel.org ;-) On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Kumar, Purushotam <purushotam@ti.com> wrote: > This patch will increase performance significantly. In my testing with a SD Extreme III high speed 2GB SD card using FAT file system on OMAP35X TI EVM, write speed has improved by 2x whereas read speed has improved by 3 times for MMCSD when CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled. It is supposed that larger/bounce buffers will be used by mmc core if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is defined. But, in the mmc core, size of buffer is set to mmc->max_req_size if mmc->max_req_size is smaller than MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ i.e. bounce buffer size (which is 64KB). By default, mmc->max_req_size is set to 4K. So, buffers of 4K will be used instead of 64K even if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is defined without this patch. This patches forces mmc core to use bounce buffer of size MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ and so performance is increased. > > Signed-off-by: Purushotam Kumar <purushotam@ti.com> > --- > Index: linux-omap-2.6/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-omap-2.6.orig/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > +++ linux-omap-2.6/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > @@ -782,6 +782,15 @@ static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct > else > host->dbclk_enabled = 1; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE > + mmc->max_phys_segs = 1; > + mmc->max_hw_segs = 1; > +#endif > + mmc->max_blk_size = 512; /* Block Length at max can be 1024 */ > + mmc->max_blk_count = 0xFFFF; /* No. of Blocks is 16 bits */ > + mmc->max_req_size = mmc->max_blk_size * mmc->max_blk_count; > + mmc->max_seg_size = mmc->max_req_size; > + > mmc->ocr_avail = mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask; > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MULTIWRITE | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | > MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED; Do you have any measurements results to share :-p -- Best Regards, Felipe Balbi felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Performance enhancement for MMCSD when feature CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled in the MMC core 2008-05-15 13:30 ` [PATCH] Performance enhancement for MMCSD when feature CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled in the MMC core Felipe Balbi @ 2008-05-16 1:03 ` Kyungmin Park 2008-05-16 6:45 ` Kumar, Purushotam 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Kyungmin Park @ 2008-05-16 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Kumar, Purushotam, linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com, Gole, Anant, linux-omap Hi, On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Felipe Balbi <felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi, > > this list moved to linux-omap@vger.kernel.org ;-) > > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Kumar, Purushotam <purushotam@ti.com> wrote: >> This patch will increase performance significantly. In my testing with a SD Extreme III high speed 2GB SD card using FAT file system on OMAP35X TI EVM, write speed has improved by 2x whereas read speed has improved by 3 times for MMCSD when CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled. It is supposed that larger/bounce buffers will be used by mmc core if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is defined. But, in the mmc core, size of buffer is set to mmc->max_req_size if mmc->max_req_size is smaller than MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ i.e. bounce buffer size (which is 64KB). By default, mmc->max_req_size is set to 4K. So, buffers of 4K will be used instead of 64K even if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is defined without this patch. This patches forces mmc core to use bounce buffer of size MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ and so performance is increased. >> >> Signed-off-by: Purushotam Kumar <purushotam@ti.com> >> --- >> Index: linux-omap-2.6/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-omap-2.6.orig/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c >> +++ linux-omap-2.6/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c >> @@ -782,6 +782,15 @@ static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct >> else >> host->dbclk_enabled = 1; >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE >> + mmc->max_phys_segs = 1; >> + mmc->max_hw_segs = 1; >> +#endif >> + mmc->max_blk_size = 512; /* Block Length at max can be 1024 */ >> + mmc->max_blk_count = 0xFFFF; /* No. of Blocks is 16 bits */ >> + mmc->max_req_size = mmc->max_blk_size * mmc->max_blk_count; >> + mmc->max_seg_size = mmc->max_req_size; >> + >> mmc->ocr_avail = mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask; >> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MULTIWRITE | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | >> MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED; > > Do you have any measurements results to share :-p > similar ways omap.c does, but it's almost same or degraded. It was tested on apollon (OMAP2420) Thank you, Kyungmin Park # iozone -A -s 128m -q 256k -U /mmc -f /mmc/test -e % before 131072 4 3014 2317 6577 6575 131072 8 2918 2702 6577 6568 131072 16 2895 2287 6560 6556 131072 32 2839 2430 6567 6551 131072 64 2929 2688 6548 6545 131072 128 2956 2534 6572 6565 131072 256 2861 2356 6571 6569 % after 131072 4 2917 2784 6383 6379 131072 8 2806 2615 6377 6397 131072 16 2834 2953 6383 6379 131072 32 2844 2492 6376 6375 131072 64 2976 2625 6395 6379 Here's patch diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c index 549517c..a0c0d38 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c @@ -1332,12 +1335,17 @@ static int __init mmc_omap_new_slot(struct mmc_omap_host mmc->f_max = min(host->pdata->max_freq, mmc->f_max); mmc->ocr_avail = slot->pdata->ocr_mask; +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE + mmc->max_phys_segs = 1; + mmc->max_hw_segs = 1; +#else /* Use scatterlist DMA to reduce per-transfer costs. * NOTE max_seg_size assumption that small blocks aren't * normally used (except e.g. for reading SD registers). */ mmc->max_phys_segs = 32; mmc->max_hw_segs = 32; +#endif mmc->max_blk_size = 2048; /* BLEN is 11 bits (+1) */ mmc->max_blk_count = 2048; /* NBLK is 11 bits (+1) */ mmc->max_req_size = mmc->max_blk_size * mmc->max_blk_count; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] Performance enhancement for MMCSD when feature CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled in the MMC core 2008-05-16 1:03 ` Kyungmin Park @ 2008-05-16 6:45 ` Kumar, Purushotam 2008-05-16 18:02 ` Tony Lindgren 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Kumar, Purushotam @ 2008-05-16 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyungmin Park, Felipe Balbi Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com, Gole, Anant, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: kyungmin78@gmail.com [mailto:kyungmin78@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kyungmin Park > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 6:34 AM > To: Felipe Balbi > Cc: Kumar, Purushotam; linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com; Gole, Anant; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Performance enhancement for MMCSD when feature CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is > enabled in the MMC core > > Hi, > > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Felipe Balbi > <felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this list moved to linux-omap@vger.kernel.org ;-) > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Kumar, Purushotam <purushotam@ti.com> wrote: > >> This patch will increase performance significantly. In my testing with a SD Extreme III high speed > 2GB SD card using FAT file system on OMAP35X TI EVM, write speed has improved by 2x whereas read > speed has improved by 3 times for MMCSD when CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled. It is supposed that > larger/bounce buffers will be used by mmc core if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is defined. But, in the mmc > core, size of buffer is set to mmc->max_req_size if mmc->max_req_size is smaller than > MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ i.e. bounce buffer size (which is 64KB). By default, mmc->max_req_size is set to > 4K. So, buffers of 4K will be used instead of 64K even if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is defined without > this patch. This patches forces mmc core to use bounce buffer of size MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ and so > performance is increased. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Purushotam Kumar <purushotam@ti.com> > >> --- > >> Index: linux-omap-2.6/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > >> =================================================================== > >> --- linux-omap-2.6.orig/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > >> +++ linux-omap-2.6/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > >> @@ -782,6 +782,15 @@ static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct > >> else > >> host->dbclk_enabled = 1; > >> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE > >> + mmc->max_phys_segs = 1; > >> + mmc->max_hw_segs = 1; > >> +#endif > >> + mmc->max_blk_size = 512; /* Block Length at max can be 1024 */ > >> + mmc->max_blk_count = 0xFFFF; /* No. of Blocks is 16 bits */ > >> + mmc->max_req_size = mmc->max_blk_size * mmc->max_blk_count; > >> + mmc->max_seg_size = mmc->max_req_size; > >> + > >> mmc->ocr_avail = mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask; > >> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MULTIWRITE | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | > >> MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED; > > > > Do you have any measurements results to share :-p > > > > similar ways omap.c does, but it's almost same or degraded. > It was tested on apollon (OMAP2420) > > Thank you, > Kyungmin Park > > # iozone -A -s 128m -q 256k -U /mmc -f /mmc/test -e > > % before > 131072 4 3014 2317 6577 6575 > 131072 8 2918 2702 6577 6568 > 131072 16 2895 2287 6560 6556 > 131072 32 2839 2430 6567 6551 > 131072 64 2929 2688 6548 6545 > 131072 128 2956 2534 6572 6565 > 131072 256 2861 2356 6571 6569 > > % after > 131072 4 2917 2784 6383 6379 > 131072 8 2806 2615 6377 6397 > 131072 16 2834 2953 6383 6379 > 131072 32 2844 2492 6376 6375 > 131072 64 2976 2625 6395 6379 > > Here's patch > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c > index 549517c..a0c0d38 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c > @@ -1332,12 +1335,17 @@ static int __init mmc_omap_new_slot(struct mmc_omap_host > mmc->f_max = min(host->pdata->max_freq, mmc->f_max); > mmc->ocr_avail = slot->pdata->ocr_mask; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE > + mmc->max_phys_segs = 1; > + mmc->max_hw_segs = 1; > +#else > /* Use scatterlist DMA to reduce per-transfer costs. > * NOTE max_seg_size assumption that small blocks aren't > * normally used (except e.g. for reading SD registers). > */ > mmc->max_phys_segs = 32; > mmc->max_hw_segs = 32; > +#endif > mmc->max_blk_size = 2048; /* BLEN is 11 bits (+1) */ > mmc->max_blk_count = 2048; /* NBLK is 11 bits (+1) */ > mmc->max_req_size = mmc->max_blk_size * mmc->max_blk_count; In my test environment, write and Read speed without this patch was 2.6Mbytes/sec and 2.7Mbytes/sec respectively whereas write and read performance with this patch has jumped to 4.4Mbytes/sec and 5MBytes/sec, respectively. This testing has been done on SD Extreme III high speed 2GB SD card using FAT file system with help of dd command. This patch is for OMAP35X and not for OMAP2420. In the case of OMAP2420, number of maximum phys_segs and hw_segs is set to 32 when CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is not enabled and so speeds are better in OMAP2420 even if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is not defined. But in the case of OMAP35X, setting of 32 to phys_segs and hw_segs is not supported currently by OMAP35X mmc controller driver. It means that phys_segs and hw_segs has to be 1 for OMAP35X mmc controller driver and so this patch increases performance. Regards, Purushotam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Performance enhancement for MMCSD when feature CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled in the MMC core 2008-05-16 6:45 ` Kumar, Purushotam @ 2008-05-16 18:02 ` Tony Lindgren 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Tony Lindgren @ 2008-05-16 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kumar, Purushotam Cc: Kyungmin Park, Felipe Balbi, linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com, Gole, Anant, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Kumar, Purushotam <purushotam@ti.com> [080515 23:50]: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: kyungmin78@gmail.com [mailto:kyungmin78@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kyungmin Park > > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 6:34 AM > > To: Felipe Balbi > > Cc: Kumar, Purushotam; linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com; Gole, Anant; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Performance enhancement for MMCSD when feature CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is > > enabled in the MMC core > > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Felipe Balbi > > <felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > this list moved to linux-omap@vger.kernel.org ;-) > > > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Kumar, Purushotam <purushotam@ti.com> wrote: > > >> This patch will increase performance significantly. In my testing with a SD Extreme III high speed > > 2GB SD card using FAT file system on OMAP35X TI EVM, write speed has improved by 2x whereas read > > speed has improved by 3 times for MMCSD when CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled. It is supposed that > > larger/bounce buffers will be used by mmc core if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is defined. But, in the mmc > > core, size of buffer is set to mmc->max_req_size if mmc->max_req_size is smaller than > > MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ i.e. bounce buffer size (which is 64KB). By default, mmc->max_req_size is set to > > 4K. So, buffers of 4K will be used instead of 64K even if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is defined without > > this patch. This patches forces mmc core to use bounce buffer of size MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ and so > > performance is increased. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Purushotam Kumar <purushotam@ti.com> > > >> --- > > >> Index: linux-omap-2.6/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > > >> =================================================================== > > >> --- linux-omap-2.6.orig/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > > >> +++ linux-omap-2.6/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > > >> @@ -782,6 +782,15 @@ static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct > > >> else > > >> host->dbclk_enabled = 1; > > >> > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE > > >> + mmc->max_phys_segs = 1; > > >> + mmc->max_hw_segs = 1; > > >> +#endif > > >> + mmc->max_blk_size = 512; /* Block Length at max can be 1024 */ > > >> + mmc->max_blk_count = 0xFFFF; /* No. of Blocks is 16 bits */ > > >> + mmc->max_req_size = mmc->max_blk_size * mmc->max_blk_count; > > >> + mmc->max_seg_size = mmc->max_req_size; > > >> + > > >> mmc->ocr_avail = mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask; > > >> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MULTIWRITE | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | > > >> MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED; > > > > > > Do you have any measurements results to share :-p > > > > > > > similar ways omap.c does, but it's almost same or degraded. > > It was tested on apollon (OMAP2420) > > > > Thank you, > > Kyungmin Park > > > > # iozone -A -s 128m -q 256k -U /mmc -f /mmc/test -e > > > > % before > > 131072 4 3014 2317 6577 6575 > > 131072 8 2918 2702 6577 6568 > > 131072 16 2895 2287 6560 6556 > > 131072 32 2839 2430 6567 6551 > > 131072 64 2929 2688 6548 6545 > > 131072 128 2956 2534 6572 6565 > > 131072 256 2861 2356 6571 6569 > > > > % after > > 131072 4 2917 2784 6383 6379 > > 131072 8 2806 2615 6377 6397 > > 131072 16 2834 2953 6383 6379 > > 131072 32 2844 2492 6376 6375 > > 131072 64 2976 2625 6395 6379 > > > > Here's patch > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c > > index 549517c..a0c0d38 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c > > @@ -1332,12 +1335,17 @@ static int __init mmc_omap_new_slot(struct mmc_omap_host > > mmc->f_max = min(host->pdata->max_freq, mmc->f_max); > > mmc->ocr_avail = slot->pdata->ocr_mask; > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE > > + mmc->max_phys_segs = 1; > > + mmc->max_hw_segs = 1; > > +#else > > /* Use scatterlist DMA to reduce per-transfer costs. > > * NOTE max_seg_size assumption that small blocks aren't > > * normally used (except e.g. for reading SD registers). > > */ > > mmc->max_phys_segs = 32; > > mmc->max_hw_segs = 32; > > +#endif > > mmc->max_blk_size = 2048; /* BLEN is 11 bits (+1) */ > > mmc->max_blk_count = 2048; /* NBLK is 11 bits (+1) */ > > mmc->max_req_size = mmc->max_blk_size * mmc->max_blk_count; > > > > In my test environment, write and Read speed without this patch was 2.6Mbytes/sec and 2.7Mbytes/sec respectively whereas write and read performance with this patch has jumped to 4.4Mbytes/sec and 5MBytes/sec, respectively. This testing has been done on SD Extreme III high speed 2GB SD card using FAT file system with help of dd command. > > This patch is for OMAP35X and not for OMAP2420. In the case of OMAP2420, number of maximum phys_segs and hw_segs is set to 32 when CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is not enabled and so speeds are better in OMAP2420 even if CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is not defined. But in the case of OMAP35X, setting of 32 to phys_segs and hw_segs is not supported currently by OMAP35X mmc controller driver. It means that phys_segs and hw_segs has to be 1 for OMAP35X mmc controller driver and so this patch increases performance. Purushotam, can you please refresh your patch so I can apply it? It currently does not apply, and it's sent with MIME quoted-printable encoding, and the description should be wrapped to look nice in git logs. Thanks, Tony ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-16 18:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB593010A9B60D4@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
2008-05-15 13:30 ` [PATCH] Performance enhancement for MMCSD when feature CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is enabled in the MMC core Felipe Balbi
2008-05-16 1:03 ` Kyungmin Park
2008-05-16 6:45 ` Kumar, Purushotam
2008-05-16 18:02 ` Tony Lindgren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox