public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] implement clock dynamic notifier array
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:14:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080620231354.21640.6034.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620231155.21640.89851.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

This patch implements the remaining code for notification of clock
rate changes via the clock framework:

- a notifier registration function, clk_notifier_register()

- a notifier unregistration function, clk_notifier_unregister()

- the clk_notify_post_rate_chg() call-chain function, has been fleshed out

The implementation is via an atomic notifier, called with the clockfw
spinlock held.  Callback functions must not sleep and must not re-enter
the clock framework, and should execute quickly.

In the medium-term future, there are likely to be few users of these
notifiers.  So, rather than storing one notifier per struct clk,
notifiers are stored in a separate, dynamically allocated list,
effectively trading execution speed (in terms of a sequential scan of
the notifier list) for memory savings.  The implementation is
completely hidden from the callbacks and is easily changed if
necessary.

Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
---

 arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c |  118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c
index 421d076..354f45f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
 
 #include <asm/io.h>
@@ -34,6 +35,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clockfw_lock);
 
 static struct clk_functions *arch_clock;
 
+static LIST_HEAD(clk_notifier_list);
+
 /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  * Standard clock functions defined in include/linux/clk.h
  *-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -380,6 +383,110 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_init_cpufreq_table);
 #endif
 
 /**
+<<<<<<< current:arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c
+=======
+ * clk_notifier_register - add a clock rate change notifier
+ * @clk: struct clk * to watch for rate echanges
+ * @nb: struct notifier_block * with callback info
+ *
+ * Request notification after a frequency change on clock 'clk'.  This
+ * uses an atomic notifier.  The callback will be called with
+ * interrupts disabled; therefore callback code should be very
+ * lightweight.  Callback code must not call back into the clock
+ * framework.  Callback code will be passed the previous and new rate
+ * of the clock.
+ *
+ * clk_notifier_register() must be called from process
+ * context.  Returns -EINVAL if called with null arguments, -ENOMEM
+ * upon allocation failure; otherwise, passes along the return value
+ * of atomic_notifier_chain_register().
+ */
+int clk_notifier_register(struct clk *clk, struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	struct clk_notifier *cn = NULL, *cn_new = NULL;
+	int r;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (!clk || !nb)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Allocate this here speculatively so we can avoid GFP_ATOMIC */
+	cn_new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_notifier), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!cn_new)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&clockfw_lock, flags);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(cn, &clk_notifier_list, node) {
+		if (cn->clk == clk)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (cn->clk != clk) {
+		cn_new->clk = clk;
+		ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&cn_new->notifier_head);
+
+		list_add(&cn_new->node, &clk_notifier_list);
+		cn = cn_new;
+	} else {
+		kfree(cn_new); /* didn't need it after all */
+	}
+
+	r = atomic_notifier_chain_register(&cn->notifier_head, nb);
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockfw_lock, flags);
+
+	return r;
+}
+
+/**
+ * clk_notifier_unregister - remove a clock rate change notifier
+ * @clk: struct clk *
+ * @nb: struct notifier_block * with callback info
+ *
+ * Request no further notification for frequency changes on clock
+ * 'clk'.  This function presently does not release memory allocated
+ * by its corresponding _register function; see inline comments for
+ * more informations.  Returns -EINVAL if called with null arguments;
+ * otherwise, passes along the return value of
+ * atomic_notifier_chain_unregister().
+ */
+int clk_notifier_unregister(struct clk *clk, struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	struct clk_notifier *cn = NULL;
+	int r = -EINVAL;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (!clk || !nb)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&clockfw_lock, flags);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(cn, &clk_notifier_list, node) {
+		if (cn->clk == clk)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (cn->clk == clk) {
+		r = atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&cn->notifier_head, nb);
+
+		/*
+		 * XXX unfortunately it seems that there is no polite
+		 * way to test if a notifier has zero users.  So once
+		 * a post-notifier has been registered on a clock,
+		 * that struct clk_notifier will not be freed, even if
+		 * all of its users unregister.
+		 */
+	} else {
+		r = -ENOENT;
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockfw_lock, flags);
+
+	return r;
+}
+
+/**
  * clk_notify_post_rate_chg - call post-clk-rate-change notifier chain
  * @clk: struct clk * that is changing rate
  * @old_rate: old rate
@@ -400,11 +507,16 @@ void clk_notify_post_rate_chg(struct clk *clk, unsigned long old_rate,
 	cnd.old_rate = old_rate;
 	cnd.new_rate = new_rate;
 
-	/* XXX Call notifier here */
-
+	list_for_each_entry(cn, &clk_notifier_list, node) {
+		if (cn->clk == clk) {
+			atomic_notifier_call_chain(&cn->notifier_head,
+						   CLK_POST_RATE_CHANGE,
+						   &cnd);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
 }
 
-
 /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_RESET_CLOCKS



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-20 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-20 23:13 [PATCH 0/2] Add clock post-rate-change notifier Paul Walmsley
2008-06-20 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] add common post-rate-change notifier code Paul Walmsley
2008-06-20 23:14 ` Paul Walmsley [this message]
2008-06-26 13:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] Add clock post-rate-change notifier Tony Lindgren
2008-07-21 10:49 ` Rajendra Nayak
2008-07-23  5:09   ` Paul Walmsley
2008-07-23 17:09   ` Koen Kooi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080620231354.21640.6034.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox