From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: Git pull request for omap patches for post 2.6.26 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:34:55 +0300 Message-ID: <20080716143451.GA8278@atomide.com> References: <20080703101139.GE14276@atomide.com> <20080707200537.GP29191@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20080708074005.GA17594@atomide.com> <20080716071835.GB30135@atomide.com> <20080716080121.GA31248@atomide.com> <20080716084552.GA23468@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20080716085734.GB31248@atomide.com> <20080716093732.GB23468@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.178]:56366 "EHLO mho-01-bos.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755130AbYGPOda (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:33:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080716093732.GB23468@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [080716 12:37]: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:57:37AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [080716 11:46]: > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:01:24AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Well looks like all omap-upstream and few omap2-clock patches have been > > > > merged. I've rebased the remaining omap2-clock and omap2-upstream > > > > patches. Will repost those two series. > > > > > > Don't bother rebasing them - I obviously already have them. > > > > Well I already rebased them, but you can you the ones you already have > > as there are no changes. > > I would have preferred you to have fixed those two _crap_ commits at the > beginning of your entire OMAP series - the two which contained no patch > whatsoever. I did remove the two empty commits: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080708.074007.cc2d62c0.en.html > Commits that are just words describing an non-existent change are utterly > useless. True, and they were promptly removed. > I did point this out at the time but you ignored me. Not true. Sounds like you had an earlier pull in your tree that you used instead. Regards, Tony