From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>
To: ext Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: musb bogosity
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:32:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080808083245.GS30719@gandalf.research.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080808082722.GA6580@linux-sh.org>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 05:27:22PM +0900, ext Paul Mundt wrote:
> The musb code currently kills the SH randconfig build (and this will hose
> any platform that also selects HAVE_CLK -- a PPC or AVR32 randconfig
> would have also hit this eventually), as can be seen here:
>
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/41095/
>
> This initial failure comes from the fact that musb handily uses "special"
> I/O routines that it handily wraps, after having failed at grepping for
> other users. Why this driver isn't using ioread/writeXX_rep() is beyond
> me, as that's the portable interface we have for doing precisely this
> sort of thing, without this bizarre PIO/MMIO wrapper munging that isn't
> even going to work on most platforms.
>
> With that ifdef in place, it's on to the next integral build failure:
>
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c: In function 'fifo_setup':
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:1122: error: 'MUSB_C_RAM_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:1122: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:1122: error: for each function it appears in.)
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c: In function 'ep_config_from_table':
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:1246: error: 'MUSB_C_RAM_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c: In function 'musb_remove':
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:2131: warning: unused variable 'ctrl_base'
> make[1]: *** [drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.o] Error 1
> make: *** [drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.o] Error 2
>
> ...
>
> $ git grep MUSB_C_RAM_BITS drivers/usb/musb
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:#define DYN_FIFO_SIZE (1<<(MUSB_C_RAM_BITS+2))
> drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h:#define MUSB_C_RAM_BITS 12
>
> ...
>
> the comment above MUSB_C_RAM_BITS seems to suggest that it's entirely dependent
> on the chip, so moving it in to musb_core.c wouldn't be terribly productive. Which
> leaves us in a situation where the core is dependent on arbitrary driver
> definitions, while the driver itself is obviously only dependent on the core.
> Has anyone actually tested this with TUSB6010 support disabled?
>
> A quick grep suggests that blackfin is also going to get bitten by this, so
> simply tossing a depends on (ARM && BROKEN) in wouldn't help matters either.
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h
> index 6bbedae..d0f812a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/io.h>
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_ARM
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM) && !defined(CONFIG_SUPERH)
> static inline void readsl(const void __iomem *addr, void *buf, int len)
> { insl((unsigned long)addr, buf, len); }
> static inline void readsw(const void __iomem *addr, void *buf, int len)
The right way to fix this would be by removing all those defines and
make that configuration come from platform_data. I have a patch for
that, I'll send it to Greg and try to be sure it gets applied. I've been
using it quite a while and it seems stable.
--
balbi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-08 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-08 8:27 musb bogosity Paul Mundt
2008-08-08 8:32 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2008-08-08 8:51 ` Paul Mundt
2008-08-08 9:04 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-08-08 9:21 ` Paul Mundt
2008-08-08 9:37 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080808083245.GS30719@gandalf.research.nokia.com \
--to=felipe.balbi@nokia.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox