Re: [RFC][DRAFT] TODO list for TI DSP BRIDGE

Trilok Soni
2008-08-18T17:20:59Z

Hi Vijay,

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Pasam, Vijay <vpasam@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Hiroshi,
>
>> Yes, "dspgateway" won't support OMAP3 but if I remember
>> correctly that TWL is already in OMAP2? and also does Camera
>> use the same mechanism of this MMU? This may be benefit or a
>> must, I guess..
>
> I agree. If we are certain that camera driver or some other driver uses
> MMU the same way bridge does and the MMU architecture is the same, it
> makes sense to make this generic code. My point is that if DSPGateway
> doesn't use TWL, it will not benefit from using the Bridge MMU code
> which has TWL enabled.
>

I think recently some one from TI posted OMAP3 camera driver at
linux-v4l2 mailing list and which I think was using camera MMU, but
not the common MMU framework it seems from the description. They
should first start converting to the common MMU infrastructure then.

http://lists-archives.org/video4linux/23215-omap3-camera-driver.html

--
---Trilok Soni