From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FOR COMMENT: void __iomem * and similar casts are Bad News
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:05:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809031506.00261.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13B9B4C6EF24D648824FF11BE8967162036545FC7D@dlee02.ent.ti.com>
On Wednesday 03 September 2008, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > > ... [ big/inexpensive fixed mappings can be virtuous ... ]
> >
> > ... which is exactly why some linux/arch/... code makes sure ioremap()
> > can return fixed mappings instead of always requiring dynamic ones.
>
> That does sound like a nice consistent way to do it. Which implementation
> of this would you recommend looking at? Do any ARMs you know of do it today?
I was just calling attention to the possibility. ISTR seeing
that AVR32 does that, and I think some MIPS hardware has the
same kind of logic. Not just those, either.
The ARM stuff seems to have changed since last I looked!
In arch/arm/include/asm/io.h there's an __arch_ioremap()
hook; it could be used instead of __arm_ioremap() ... and
it seems <mach/io.h> would define __arch_ioremap().
So at a first glance, OMAPs _could_ define that arch function
to look at the physical address to see if it's covered by a
fixed mapping, then reuse it ... else use __arm_ioremap().
According to Mr. Grep, there are at least 10 ARMs that work
like that in mainline. Maybe Russell can recommend one of
them as a preferred model.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-27 22:08 FOR COMMENT: void __iomem * and similar casts are Bad News Russell King
2008-08-31 21:47 ` David Brownell
2008-09-02 22:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 7:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-03 16:40 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 19:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-03 19:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 21:09 ` David Brownell
2008-09-03 23:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-03 19:58 ` Woodruff, Richard
2008-09-03 20:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-03 21:19 ` Woodruff, Richard
2008-09-03 20:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 21:32 ` Woodruff, Richard
2008-09-03 21:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 21:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-03 21:46 ` Multi-Boot: Was " Woodruff, Richard
2008-09-03 21:18 ` David Brownell
2008-09-03 21:40 ` Woodruff, Richard
2008-09-03 22:05 ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-09-03 22:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-04 0:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-04 1:06 ` David Brownell
2008-09-04 7:25 ` Arun KS
2008-09-03 15:07 ` Eduardo Valentin
2008-09-03 18:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-04 0:16 ` David Brownell
2008-09-03 15:33 ` Eduardo Valentin
2008-09-03 18:48 ` Russell King
2008-09-03 19:33 ` Eduardo Valentin
2008-09-03 19:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-03 20:04 ` Eduardo Valentin
2008-09-03 20:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-03 20:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 20:56 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 21:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-03 21:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 21:00 ` Koen Kooi
2008-09-03 20:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 21:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-03 21:26 ` Eduardo Valentin
2008-09-03 21:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-03 21:35 ` David Brownell
2008-09-03 23:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-04 9:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-04 16:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-04 16:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-04 16:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-04 17:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-04 17:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-04 21:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-04 21:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-05 1:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-05 5:17 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-09-05 5:58 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-09-29 5:16 ` Arun KS
2008-09-29 7:44 ` Jarkko Nikula
2008-09-29 9:24 ` Arun KS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200809031506.00261.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=r-woodruff2@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox