From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: omapzoom tree broken? Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:08:53 +0300 Message-ID: <20080910190851.GB6671@frodo> References: <20080909175929.GK8894@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1f11a5490809091137r66a9d91cl850ad6e034fe5844@mail.gmail.com> <20080909185415.GM8894@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Reply-To: me@felipebalbi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns1.siteground211.com ([209.62.36.12]:35325 "EHLO serv01.siteground211.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751763AbYIJTJP (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:09:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080909185415.GM8894@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Ashwin Bihari , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:54:15PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Looks like the pack index was corrupted; removing the one it just fetched > and repulling has made it happier. > > However, it's made me unhappier. Again, can we please have it accessible > via the git protocol. Or at least can whoever looks after that tree avoid > repacking it except maybe once a month? > > Why? I don't want to have to keep on fetching 300 odd MB of pack files > every time I pull from this tree. 10 minutes into my current pull and > I only have 80MB... another 220MB to go. IOW, 45 minutes for a pull. > > This really isn't practical. Sure, repacking should be avoided on servers for that. Do what you want with your local copy and repack sure helps making git a bit faster, still it's not good for the server side since we'd have to pull the packs again and again. -- balbi