From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Peter 'p2' De Schrijver" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Debobs and ETK padconf implementation Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:06:49 +0300 Message-ID: <20080925120649.GF4654@codecarver.research.nokia.com> References: <1221663749-26121-1-git-send-email-peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com> <1221663749-26121-2-git-send-email-peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com> <1221663749-26121-3-git-send-email-peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com> <87ej38ob7t.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <20080925113550.GC4654@codecarver.research.nokia.com> <873ajoo3mk.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <20080925115256.GD4654@codecarver.research.nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230]:44361 "EHLO mgw-mx03.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757354AbYIYMH3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:07:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080925115256.GD4654@codecarver.research.nokia.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: ext Kevin Hilman Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > > In that case, what is the proposed method for other kernel code to use > > the debobs lines? > > Hmm, good point :) My idea was to use the gpiolib calls on GPIO12 - > GPIO29, but then there is no way for a user to know if the GPIO was > assigned to debobs or not... Maybe debobs should register as gpiolib > 'chip' and reexport those lines ? Would that make sense ? > Actually, debobs should be claiming IO pads, not GPIOs. Unfortunately there is no way to do that currently :( Cheers, Peter. -- goa is a state of mind