From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] twl4030 updates Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:45:06 -0700 Message-ID: <200809271445.07134.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <1222427996-7018-1-git-send-email-felipe.balbi@nokia.com> <200809271214.30165.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080927211726.GA8468@frodo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.185]:29240 "HELO smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753396AbYI0VpJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:45:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080927211726.GA8468@frodo> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: me@felipebalbi.com Cc: Felipe Balbi , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren On Saturday 27 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:14:29PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > Here are some more cleanups to consider including ... these > > should apply on top of all nine patches. > > You want me to keep it on top of the other 9 (10) patches or meld it > together ? I think it'd be better to meld on the previous patches so > we introduce the patches the way they should look like. Right ? Not sure it matters in this case; if we were talking about patches that will merge upstream, I'd agree. But what merges upstream will look like a brand new twl4030 core, in drivers/mfd, so all this OMAP history will be gone. So the issue here is just what's easiest for you and Tony. - Dave