From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] twl4030 updates Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:46:44 +0300 Message-ID: <20080927214643.GB8468@frodo> References: <1222427996-7018-1-git-send-email-felipe.balbi@nokia.com> <200809271214.30165.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080927211726.GA8468@frodo> <200809271445.07134.david-b@pacbell.net> Reply-To: me@felipebalbi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns1.siteground211.com ([209.62.36.12]:49321 "EHLO serv01.siteground211.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750938AbYI0Vqz (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:46:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809271445.07134.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: David Brownell Cc: me@felipebalbi.com, Felipe Balbi , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:45:06PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Saturday 27 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:14:29PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > Here are some more cleanups to consider including ... these > > > should apply on top of all nine patches. > > > > You want me to keep it on top of the other 9 (10) patches or meld it > > together ? I think it'd be better to meld on the previous patches so > > we introduce the patches the way they should look like. Right ? > > Not sure it matters in this case; if we were talking about patches > that will merge upstream, I'd agree. > > But what merges upstream will look like a brand new twl4030 core, > in drivers/mfd, so all this OMAP history will be gone. > > So the issue here is just what's easiest for you and Tony. Cool, Tony, what do you say ? -- balbi