From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: fix typo in omap_wdt.c Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:25:29 +0300 Message-ID: <20080929092528.GE30555@frodo> References: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02D5DC959A@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20080926175237.GD9890@frodo> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02D5DC95BB@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20080926192746.GG9890@frodo> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02D5DC9707@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Reply-To: me@felipebalbi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns1.siteground211.com ([209.62.36.12]:57298 "EHLO serv01.siteground211.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750712AbYI2JZi (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:25:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02D5DC9707@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Gadiyar, Anand" Cc: "me@felipebalbi.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "felipe.balbi@nokia.com" , tony@atomide.com On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:56:06AM +0530, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > > > > > > Those patches weren't applied to linux-omap yet, so this change should > > > > be melded into the patch that introduced it. It's better to resend that > > > > patch then to create a messed up bisect line. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > balbi > > > > > > Of course they were merged. I saw this warning when I compiled linux-omap, > > > when sending in that pin-muxing patch. > > > > You're right, at first look I thought this was for omap_hdq.c :-p > > > > Anyways, this patch should go also to Wim. Please send a copy of this > > patch to him so he can apply to his tree as well, btw, here's > > his mail: > > > > Wim Van Sebroeck > > > > Done. I'm guessing I don't need to CC linux-omap on that. Let me know if > I should have. I've sent it to Wim, with a CC to you (Felipe). I think you can send it to l-o so we avoid these kinds of bugs. Tony, what do you say ? -- balbi