linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@nokia.com>
To: ext Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	i2c@lm-sensors.org, Juha Yrjola <juha.yrjola@solidboot.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [i2c] [PATCH 1/8] i2c-omap: Do not use interruptible wait call in omap_i2c_xfer_msg
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:51:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080930145100.62fdb0fa.jarkko.nikula@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080929222100.GN2716@fluff.org.uk>

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:21:00 +0100
"ext Ben Dooks" <ben-linux@fluff.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:53:47AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@nokia.com>
> > 
> > If there is a signal pending and wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout
> > terminates with -ERESTARTSYS, we return and disable the i2c clocks in
> > omap_i2c_xfer.
> > 
> > If we terminate before sending last i2c message with a stop condition, the
> > bus remains busy and we are not able to send new messages into bus with
> > successive omap_i2c_xfer calls. Therefore a pending signal is not caught
> > here and we return only because of timeout or i2c error.
> 
> I assume that this is preferable to aborting an transfer when the
> signal is caught (if possible) ?
>  
Most probably yes as long as the stop condition is generated
successfully. IRCC bug behind this fix, OMAP I2C went into bus
arbitration without code able to recover easily or something like that.

Would it be ok to let this fix as now, probably adding FIXME line near
wait_for_completion_timeout so that we don't break anything now but
note that this is not optimal fix?


Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-30 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-25  7:53 [PATCH 0/8] Updates for i2c-omap from linux-omap tree for review, v2 Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25  7:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] i2c-omap: Do not use interruptible wait call in omap_i2c_xfer_msg Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25  7:53   ` [PATCH 2/8] i2c-omap: Close suspected race between omap_i2c_idle() and omap_i2c_isr() Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25  7:53     ` [PATCH 3/8] i2c-omap: Add high-speed support to omap-i2c Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25  7:53       ` [PATCH 4/8] i2c-omap: FIFO handling support and broken hw workaround for i2c-omap Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25  7:53         ` [PATCH 5/8] i2c-omap: Add support on 34xx Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25  7:53           ` [PATCH 6/8] i2c-omap: Mark init-only functions as __init Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25  7:53             ` [PATCH 7/8] i2c-omap: Don't compile in OMAP15xx I2C ISR for non-OMAP15xx builds Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25  7:53               ` [PATCH 8/8] i2c-omap: Clean-up i2c-omap Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 11:40                 ` [PATCH 8/8] i2c-omap: Clean-up i2c-omap, v3 Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:31                 ` [i2c] [PATCH 8/8] i2c-omap: Clean-up i2c-omap Ben Dooks
2008-10-17 15:41                   ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:29               ` [i2c] [PATCH 7/8] i2c-omap: Don't compile in OMAP15xx I2C ISR for non-OMAP15xx builds Ben Dooks
2008-09-29 23:06                 ` David Brownell
2008-09-30  5:35                   ` Paul Walmsley
2008-09-30  5:36                     ` Paul Walmsley
2008-10-17 15:40                       ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:30             ` [i2c] [PATCH 6/8] i2c-omap: Mark init-only functions as __init Ben Dooks
2008-10-17 15:39               ` Tony Lindgren
2008-10-17 17:07                 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:28           ` [i2c] [PATCH 5/8] i2c-omap: Add support on 34xx Ben Dooks
2008-10-17 15:38             ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 11:39         ` [PATCH 4/8] i2c-omap: FIFO handling support and broken hw workaround for i2c-omap, v3 Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:27         ` [i2c] [PATCH 4/8] i2c-omap: FIFO handling support and broken hw workaround for i2c-omap Ben Dooks
2008-09-29 22:25       ` [i2c] [PATCH 3/8] i2c-omap: Add high-speed support to omap-i2c Ben Dooks
2008-10-17 15:37         ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:21     ` [i2c] [PATCH 2/8] i2c-omap: Close suspected race between omap_i2c_idle() and omap_i2c_isr() Ben Dooks
2008-09-29 22:21   ` [i2c] [PATCH 1/8] i2c-omap: Do not use interruptible wait call in omap_i2c_xfer_msg Ben Dooks
2008-09-30 11:51     ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2008-10-17 15:35       ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:23 ` [i2c] [PATCH 0/8] Updates for i2c-omap from linux-omap tree for review, v2 Ben Dooks
2008-09-30  5:35   ` Tony Lindgren
2008-10-17 16:04     ` git-pull request for i2c-omap changes (Re: [i2c] [PATCH 0/8] Updates for i2c-omap from linux-omap tree for review, v2) Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080930145100.62fdb0fa.jarkko.nikula@nokia.com \
    --to=jarkko.nikula@nokia.com \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=juha.yrjola@solidboot.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).