From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: change twl4030-usb back to subsys_initcall Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:28:32 +0300 Message-ID: <20081003132830.GL25482@atomide.com> References: <200810030136.33838.david-b@pacbell.net> <1223027154-20385-1-git-send-email-felipe.balbi@nokia.com> <132EE04E-D594-4F84-9C2B-D907D3D4CD5E@student.utwente.nl> <20081003120445.GB27798@gandalf.research.nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.178]:64678 "EHLO mho-01-bos.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750721AbYJCNZh (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:25:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081003120445.GB27798@gandalf.research.nokia.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: ext Koen Kooi , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Felipe Balbi [081003 15:05]: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:19:33PM +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > Op 3 okt 2008, om 11:45 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende geschreven: > > > >> without it, otg_get/set_transceiver won't be useful and > >> twl4030-usb transceiver won't get to musb code. > > > > Is the 'fix-something' patch still needed, and if yes, why isn't it in l-o > > git yet? > > we need that otg_get/set_transceiver call, yes. But those are omap > specifc. there's a patch pending in linux-usb making those calls > generic. > > I'd say we can keep a patch in l-o only untill otg_get/set_transceiver > hooks get accepted. > > What say you Tony ? Sure, we should keep things working for all the omap users while waiting for the necessary stuff to get merged into mainline. Felipe, just let me know what we need for l-o tree for musb. Tony