From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] ARM: OMAP: Fix sparse, checkpatch warnings in OMAP2/3 PRCM/PM code Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:19:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20081004131911.GA5674@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20081002163508.15385.43247.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20081002163749.15385.75147.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:56477 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751893AbYJDNT0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Oct 2008 09:19:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081002163749.15385.75147.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 10:37:50AM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > static void omap2_clk_wait_ready(struct clk *clk) > { > - void __iomem *reg, *other_reg, *st_reg; > - u32 bit; > - > - /* > - * REVISIT: This code is pretty ugly. It would be nice to generalize > - * it and pull it into struct clk itself somehow. > - */ > - reg = clk->enable_reg; > - if ((((u32)reg & 0xff) >= CM_FCLKEN1) && > - (((u32)reg & 0xff) <= OMAP24XX_CM_FCLKEN2)) > - other_reg = (void __iomem *)(((u32)reg & ~0xf0) | 0x10); /* CM_ICLKEN* */ > - else if ((((u32)reg & 0xff) >= CM_ICLKEN1) && > - (((u32)reg & 0xff) <= OMAP24XX_CM_ICLKEN4)) > - other_reg = (void __iomem *)(((u32)reg & ~0xf0) | 0x00); /* CM_FCLKEN* */ > + u32 bit, other_reg, st_reg; > + unsigned long reg; > + > + reg = (unsigned long)clk->enable_reg; > + if (((reg & 0xff) >= CM_FCLKEN1) && > + ((reg & 0xff) <= OMAP24XX_CM_FCLKEN2)) > + other_reg = ((reg & ~0xf0) | 0x10); /* CM_ICLKEN* */ > + else if (((reg & 0xff) >= CM_ICLKEN1) && > + ((reg & 0xff) <= OMAP24XX_CM_ICLKEN4)) > + other_reg = ((reg & ~0xf0) | 0x00); /* CM_FCLKEN* */ > else > return; > > /* REVISIT: What are the appropriate exclusions for 34XX? */ > /* No check for DSS or cam clocks */ > - if (cpu_is_omap24xx() && ((u32)reg & 0x0f) == 0) { /* CM_{F,I}CLKEN1 */ > + if (cpu_is_omap24xx() && (reg & 0x0f) == 0) { /* CM_{F,I}CLKEN1 */ > if (clk->enable_bit == OMAP24XX_EN_DSS2_SHIFT || > clk->enable_bit == OMAP24XX_EN_DSS1_SHIFT || > clk->enable_bit == OMAP24XX_EN_CAM_SHIFT) > @@ -249,25 +245,25 @@ static void omap2_clk_wait_ready(struct clk *clk) > /* REVISIT: What are the appropriate exclusions for 34XX? */ > /* OMAP3: ignore DSS-mod clocks */ > if (cpu_is_omap34xx() && > - (((u32)reg & ~0xff) == (u32)OMAP_CM_REGADDR(OMAP3430_DSS_MOD, 0) || > - ((((u32)reg & ~0xff) == (u32)OMAP_CM_REGADDR(CORE_MOD, 0)) && > - clk->enable_bit == OMAP3430_EN_SSI_SHIFT))) > + ((reg & ~0xff) == (u32)OMAP_CM_REGADDR(OMAP3430_DSS_MOD, 0) || > + (((reg & ~0xff) == (u32)OMAP_CM_REGADDR(CORE_MOD, 0)) && > + clk->enable_bit == OMAP3430_EN_SSI_SHIFT))) > return; > > /* Check if both functional and interface clocks > * are running. */ > bit = 1 << clk->enable_bit; > - if (!(__raw_readl(other_reg) & bit)) > + if (!(__raw_readl((void __iomem *)other_reg) & bit)) This isn't an improvement. Moving casts to the readl/writel macros is a definite no no. The rest of the patch is fine.