From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: Increase VMALLOC_END to allow 256MB RAM
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:16:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081006071634.GF14042@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04C4B3A9-6FEA-4141-BDAB-74C7274301BC@student.utwente.nl>
* Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> [081004 12:39]:
>
> Op 2 okt 2008, om 11:29 heeft Kevin Hilman het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> writes:
>>
>>> This increases VMALLOC_END to 0x18000000, making room for 256MB
>>> RAM with the default 128MB vmalloc region.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h b/arch/arm/
>>> plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h
>>> index d8515cb..b97dfaf 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h
>>> @@ -17,5 +17,5 @@
>>> * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>>> * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
>>> 02111-1307 USA
>>> */
>>> -#define VMALLOC_END (PAGE_OFFSET + 0x17000000)
>>> +#define VMALLOC_END (PAGE_OFFSET + 0x18000000)
>>
>> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
>>
>> I have a similar patch locally, but the problem I currently have with
>> it is that there is no longer any hole between vmalloc space and the
>> beginning of IO space (the first virtual mappings start at
>> 0xd8000000.)
>>
>> It's a bit unsafe, but IMO it's is probably OK for the short term.
>> Longer term I think the virtual address space of the OMAP kernels
>> needs to be reworked. It currenly just maps directly onto the
>> physical address space, which makes the IO_ADDRESS() conversion macros
>> simple, but leaves lots of wasted space in the virtual address space.
Seems to be also safe for omap1, so I've pushed it.
> I was told that omap3 support 512MB of ram, so is it possible to account
> for that as well, or can we revisit that when the actual LP-DDR become
> available?
Well, to make room for a long term solution let's do the following:
- Use OMAP1_IO_ADDRESS and OMAP2_IO_ADDRES and get rid of
OMAP_IO_ADDRESS. This allows compiling in more code into a single
binary
- Remove the remaining io_v2p() and any XXX_IO_ADDRESS()
in the drivers. Drivers should be now using ioremap() as noted
earlier
- Then we can further split OMAP2_IO_ADDRESS() into L3_IO_ADDRESS()
and L4_IO_ADDRESS(), which allows us to move L4_XXXX_VIRT out
of the way
Anybody got better ideas?
Regards,
Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-02 8:36 [PATCH] OMAP: Increase VMALLOC_END to allow 256MB RAM Mans Rullgard
2008-10-02 9:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2008-10-04 9:38 ` Koen Kooi
2008-10-06 7:16 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081006071634.GF14042@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox